Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipteq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The consensus is that the reference provided is not sufficient not meet the general notability criteria, and so this article should be deleted  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Ipteq

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Apparently non notable company. Kumioko (talk) 00:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I cannot find any third party articles about them which assert their notability. DietFoodstamp (talk) 01:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep but improve referencing. I found a few independent sources discussing,  this company which makes a unique product.  Wikipedia's corporate notability guideline is met. NJ Wine (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:CORP (and, more generally, WP:GNG) is not met by one source discussing the company's product and a listing in a directory of Islamic products: that is not significant coverage and I couldn't find any more. Dricherby (talk) 22:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. Article was created by new user who has made no other contributions to wikipedia. Dricherby (talk) 22:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've also found one newspaper article in German from 2003 which has two paras on the company and its clock, but nothing else significant. If there was an article on prayer clocks, this would warrant a mention there. —S MALL  JIM   15:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.