Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Ahmed Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Iqbal Ahmed Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references and or citations Ghorpaapi (talk) 15:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Please do not delete this account as this is an account of very famous Indian Classical vocalist of Dilli Gharana, India. for reference check his website www.dilligharana.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imran4lov (talk • contribs) 7 May 2013
 * Comment. I found a passing mention here. I'll look for better sources tomorrow. If verified, this person passes WP:POLITICIAN. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it's more likely that it's a different person with the same name. -- wintonian talk  02:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete if sources don't show up by the end of this AfD. The name is sufficiently common that Googling is not helpful, and as currently written the article fails WP:V, a core policy. If we can get some good sources, it would pass WP:POLITICIAN. Ray  Talk 19:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  01:00, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not much to add to the above comments really, just that the article certainly does assert notability per WP:POLITICIAN, but there seem to be no sources (in English at least) that support this and whilst the name seems to be fairly common I think we would need a good source that makes clear that the subject is this same person and not just their namesake with similar characteristics. I think this is going to be one of those articles that would be primarily supported by foreign language sources if it is retained and any can be found, until then I don't think it should remain. -- wintonian talk  02:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. The comment above by Imran4lov is confusing as this article appears to refer to a different person. As a politician, this person clearly meets WP:POLITICIAN except so far as no citations are given. Bondegezou (talk) 15:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.