Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ira Carmen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No rationale for deletion provided. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 17:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Ira Carmen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Comment: completing incomplete AfD from 98.212.48.92. No reason given for AfD. I am neutral at this time. Redfarmer (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —Sting   Buzz Me...   12:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Improperly filed AfD: no reason for the nomination given. Nsk92 (talk) 12:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as an unreasonable nomination. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 13:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. On the assumption that full professors at major research universities pass WP:PROF. Almost the entire article as it is written has to go, though.  Most of it is a description of his top-ten lists, whose notability is not established with reliable sources and smell like WP:HOAX.  The same goes for his political views.  A description of his published work seems more in order, since I presume that is why the U of Illinois made him a full professor in the first place.  RJC Talk Contribs 17:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.