Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irai Ningthou


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Irai Ningthou

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Aside from Wikipedia mirrors and the two extremely antiquated sources in this article, there's basically nothing coming up in searches for this article that was recently "translated" from Simple English wikipedia. Misspelled? Unintentional hoax? Whatever it is, I can't find WP:GNG for it. asilvering (talk) 06:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 09:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and India. asilvering (talk) 06:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * will probably be able to support the existence better as they wrote the simple English Wikipedia article on this and a lot of other pages related to Meitei culture. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 15:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Actually, most of the information of this very Meitei deity are available in Meitei language sources (in formats which are not readable to OCR) and less in English language sources. That's why Google doesn't display much in its Latin spelling search. It's neither misspelled nor a hoax. I have added a good source in Meitei language. Hope it might help the article to some extend. --Haoreima (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep After Haoreima's addition of a more recently-published source. The wp:search engine test used by nom risks reinforcing systemic bias in articles related to a culture whose native language is not recognised by OCR. small jars 10:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is at least a notable subject and now possess reliable source (added after this deletion nomination). Thanks! --Haoreima (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.