Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. This is a badly out-of-process deletion request based on the nominator's frustration over being repeatedly reverted, and it clearly stands no chance of resulting in deletion. ST47 (talk) 20:17, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * WP:TNT this page is just being edited like it was a huge shit, buts its useless and full of synth. just delete and start over. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC))


 * Keep. I do think some sections like Iran–Saudi_Arabia_proxy_conflict could be deleted as WP:SYNTH or unrelated, but as a whole the article looks decent and or salvageable. I possible missed it on the talk page, but I wished the issues of the article were discussed more on the talk page, before it was proposed being 'started over' Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:17, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes but honestly its better to start over because this user (no insults) removed most synth but also removed some non-OR ,non-SYNTH, or Sourced Stuff Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Surely a new version, started over, would attract the exact same editing conflicts as it does now? Geschichte (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Ironic how the nominator is saying it's full of synth when he was adding synth to begin with. This is nothing but an attempt to not improve the article. This is nothing but disruption. The nominator has also been reported at ANI over this kind of disruptive behavior. And I would like to know what non-OR and synth I removed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Look man, to be honest, it just better. Because if we follow WP:TNT and restart, no synth can be added. . So yo may not really understand that much, but to me, just blow it up and start the fuck over (and yes, ive been taught to swear.)Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No, it isn't better and your choice of words isn't helping you. You haven't even provided evidence of what my removal or addition qualifies as OR/Synth, nor have you proven yourself what is wrong with the article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Look, here, here, and here. All dont have nothing to do because in Pakistan, its mainly just AQ, Taliban, Salafis, and IS vs. the Government. Jaish ulAdl or whatever that name is, is not supported by Saudis officially, and i put allegedly, and was classified SYNTH, but Jaish, alleged, and is not synth? and Iran-Iraq is WAY before any of this.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, look at this. Europe has nothing to do. Only France, Turkey, and ALbania have to do. And at least merge the Albania section to Europe. Serbia saying Hezbollah is terror does not mean its support for Saudi Arabia. Also, s Poland was removed bc SYNTH, then why didnt you guys merge it into Europe. Also, Im not going to be able to edit next week bc I have school. So there, you happyMausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No, because you could tag the section or removed it over synth concerns. This whole Afd is not necessary. I recommend a speedy close to this. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, look at this. Europe has nothing to do. Only France, Turkey, and ALbania have to do. And at least merge the Albania section to Europe. Serbia saying Hezbollah is terror does not mean its support for Saudi Arabia. Also, s Poland was removed bc SYNTH, then why didnt you guys merge it into Europe. Also, Im not going to be able to edit next week bc I have school. So there, you happyMausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, mentioning this Isreal does not have official ties with KSA. If turkey does,then why is Israel in the support while Turkey is a third party? Same with the Kurds because some kurds like the ones in Syria (AANES, SDF, YPG, YPJ, etc.) are more supported by Russia and Assad rather than CJTFOIR Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: "I don't like it" is not a valid deletion criterion.&#32;- Sumanuil (talk) 01:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I didnt put 'I dont like this". I put that it should be started over due to conflicting edits Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: Just to comment, every time I add something like Egypt supports Assad WITH A SOURCE, WikiCleanerMan removes it. Or when I add an Iranian proxy group, they also remove it (gender neutral). But seriously, I add like 'Turkey backs Hamas' or Muslim Brotherhood supports GNA', IT GETS REMOVED EVEN THOUGH ITS SOURCED. Thats why I am angry. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep This AfD nomination led straight to an ANI discussion about the nom's conduct at this article. The nomination was malformed, but this has been fixed. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 07:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03</b> ( d  c̄ ) 07:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This nomination hasn't been logged for August 9, 2021. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and logged it. Admittedly without Twinkle, these is quite multi-stepped. Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep without prejudice against renomination in the future. Looking at the nomination (and further comments here), the edit history of the article in question, and the talk page, it's fairly obvious that this is a disruptive escalation of a content dispute. WP:CSK applies. TompaDompa (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is an issue that can be resolved by discussing with each other, collaborating and editing. Deletion is completely unnecessary. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.