Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irandokht


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  12:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Irandokht

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent significance. Abbottonian (talk) 16:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * She was a PRINCESS. So the page meets notability criteria. (I just made some changes in article to show this issue obviously)-- Freshman404 Talk 17:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You need to provide reliable references to verify it. See WP:VERIFY. Abbottonian (talk) 04:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Freshman404 Talk 15:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources are in Persian and hard to verify but Wikipedia does not require English language sources. Considering who she was and when she lived there are likely other sources in Persian or offline English sources. J bh  Talk  14:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note Nominator was blocked as part of an AfD vote stacking SOCK farm. See Sockpuppet investigations/JessikaRita. J bh  Talk  15:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 10:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

~