Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iranian blogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep and move per suggestion (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Iranian blogs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The blog notes there are 700,000 Iranian blogs so a list of them isn't appropiate. Many events in the article are of questionable notability. Computerjoe 's talk 11:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC) EDIT: Just realized Axmann8 said 'Move', not 'Merge'. Sorry about that. Anti venin  12:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, after considering Antivenin's point. Move. Are there any articles about Entertainment in Iran, Iranian censorship, etc? -Axmann8  ( Talk )  12:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't understand how you can merge a timeline into an article about entertainment in Iran. This article should be kept, however the title of the article should be changed. It provides a detailed timeline (and summary) of internet censorship in Iran. Anti  venin  12:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I actually meant merge, lol. -Axmann8  ( Talk )  13:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh. So I was right after all. =P Anti  venin  13:04, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Move to Blogging in Iran – such a change should clarify that the article is about the general topic of blogging in Iran and not just a list of Iranian blogs. –Black Falcon (Talk) 02:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Move as above. -- samj in out 16:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I would agree that moving seems to be the best course of action here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yahoodaddy! (talk • contribs) 16:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Blogging in Iran per Black Falcon. well-cited, organized article. Bearian (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm willing to agree with the consesus to move this article. My problem was primarily what the name suggested. Computerjoe 's talk 19:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as long time Amnesty International member have long known about this (mainly due to official persecution of its writers) but never seen an article on it, itself. -74.242.254.23 (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Move Agree with Black Falcon. And I don't think the article is "unnotable" either. --Roaring Siren (talk) 15:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Move to Blogging in Iran and clean up a bit.  Obviously a notable subject. Jwray (talk) 20:25, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Move per above - reasonable topic. Eusebeus (talk) 23:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to Blogging in Iran and focus on the environment, akin to Internet censorship in Iran. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to Blogging in Iran per above.--Sloane (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.