Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irena Jordanova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Irena Jordanova

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The topic does not meet WP:NAUTHOR, WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG criteria. See source analysis table.

WP:BEFORE does not reveal any further usable sources. —Alalch E. 14:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It may be of interest to participants (but should not be seen as determinative with respect to deleting or keeping, and is not the movativator behind this AfD) that this article owes its existence to an old Macedonian book promotion initiative which was recently discussed at ANI.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Literature,  and North Macedonia. —Alalch E. 14:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per source analysis above. Nothing useful in google search or gnews either. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 16:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I find one interview for this person; otherwise the source analysis table shows none are valid sourcing. Delete for not meeting AUTHOR. Happy to reconsider if some book reviews or stories about the author in the native language. Oaktree b (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. As I mentioned earlier on the talk page, three novels suggests that WP:NAUTHOR is a possible notability claim. But I can't find evidence for it. Ordinarily I would hesitate to call for deletion since I don't read Macedonian and am unfamiliar with the media architecture there - but given the ANI incident Alalch E. mentions, I think if there were other reviews, the promotors responsible for these articles would have linked them. So I'm inclined to believe they don't exist. -- asilvering (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a new one... We ask for sources, they get some "published" and immediately use them for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Oaktree b Unfortunately it seems they may have been at it for some time, so if you find any Macedonian writers with suspiciously timed reviews in the references, they might be worth a deeper look. -- asilvering (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.