Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irena Lipienė


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Irena Lipienė

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The artist (based on the Lithuanian version) appears to be a commercial stained-glass artist. I find no evidence of notability based no matches in GNews and only incidental mentions in GBooks. There is only one source quoted in the Lithuanian version and that is to a Universal Lithuanian Encyclopedia. Unprodded without any improvement or rationale given, so raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 07:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC) One would think an article in a national encyclopedia would make it notable. Obviously not.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 07:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 07:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, & no assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 12:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - definitely not notable Andrew vdBK  ( talk ) 23:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I have been pondering your comment and I can think of no current consensus that automatically confers notability to all entries in all Encyclopaedias. Such a third party source would be considered reliable, however the Universal Lithuanian Encyclopedia has a distinct political mission - visuomenę su pasaulio kultūra, užfiksuos šiuolaikinį mokslo lygį, propaguos žmonijos humanistines vertybes, padės Lietuvos žmonėms įveikti sovietų ideologiją - which may well be ethically worthwhile but makes the focus of the publication non-neutral due to potential weight issues. The fact that Lipienė appears not to be mentioned by any other sources we can find so far should be of concern considering that 2 years have been given as a grace period for this otherwise uncited stub. Fæ (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete nothing in gnews. google just reveals mirrors of WP. LibStar (talk) 12:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.