Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene's Puddle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Irene's Puddle and K. S. Willcox
Advert / vanity articles about a non-notable book not yet / only just published and its author. -- RHaworth 01:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete "Irene's Puddle"? Four Google hits, all from the book's web site. "K. S. Willcox"? Three hits. "Kim Smith-Willcox"? Zero. -- Kicking222 01:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep This IS a published book, albeit a relatively unknown one. However, I would leave it up, but that's more of a personal opinion then an interpretation of policy. --Mysmartmouth 02:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Amazon has never heard of this author, and they sell self-published material. Arbusto 03:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Peta 05:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete looks totally nn at this point in time Marcus22 20:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete I posted both of these articles regarding a book that has just been sent to press. I can wait to post them again once distribution has occurred. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jefficator (talk • contribs) [author of the articles]
 * You should wait longer than that: you should wait until the book and its author have actually become notable. And the best way to establish their notability is to wait until someone else writes about them. -- RHaworth 09:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.