Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Xavier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn in light of sources found.. LibStar (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Irene Xavier

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:BIO. almost comes under WP:ONEVENT. not a lot of coverage for this individual. gnews also refers to other Irene Xaviers. . LibStar (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only apparent third-party source that's even close to reliable is, which doesn't seem to constitute significant coverage. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 02:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC) changing to neutral per Mkativerata. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 02:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously gnews isn't going to present much for a person who was most prominent for something that happened in the 1980s, and in a country where the mainstream media doesn't give any oxygen to opposition activists. These google book hits get her well over the line, in my view - wide non-trivial coverage: 1. There's also substantial coverage if an ordinary google search is conducted. I might just do some work on this article in the next day or so. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Many references show up in Google Books searches; look for Irene Xavier Malaysia for 205 hits.  This article should be improved and made WP:BETTER and not hastily deleted based on a single search of the wrong archive.  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 02:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.