Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irfán Colloquia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Irfán Colloquia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

There are no third party sources about this lecture series indicating notability. All of the sources are self-published sources including some Facebook pages which are not considered reliable. This article had previously been deleted at Articles for deletion/Irfan colloquia Jeff3000 (talk) 12:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 13:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Well... If there were a an article, Bahá'í Faith in the United States, I'd recommend merging it to that article.  But no such article seems to exist.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Even if that article existed, there are no sources stating that this colloquium is notable, either in the wider community, in the Baha'i Faith, or the Baha'i Faith in the United States.  It doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability policies in any respect.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 00:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I agree - I've also looked for references that it is notable and have found none. There was a suggestions that some comprehensive list of journals on religion had it listed but the google hit didn't provide any preview - and the book itself probably lists a great many such journals. That was the only hit beyond self-published that I found. Smkolins (talk) 11:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 06:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. WP:COI creation with no reliable sources establishing that this series meets WP:ORG.  In previous deletion discussion Articles for deletion/Irfan colloquia, the same article creator  says he is the webmaster/publisher for this organization.  Good faith efforts by other editors have come up with no substantial coverage of the subject. --Closeapple (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.