Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irfan colloquia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G12 by CactusWriter. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Irfan colloquia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is a substantial copy of organization's about page. May be spam, or advertisement. R mosler | ●   14:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; not notable, no secondary sources to indicate why it is notable. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was just informed about the existence of the new page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irfan_colloquia . I am the webmaster and typesetter for all this group's publications in English, including irfancolloquia.org/about (the webpage noted for possible copyright infringement. I affirm that our group DOES give permission for this use. I will begin cleaning up and improving http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irfan_colloquia this week. To confirm that I have permission and access, I can be reached at our domain name: contact@irfancolloquia.org . Jonah22 (talk) 21:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment It's not solely an issue of copyright, but of notability, with no secondary, independent sources providing significant coverage. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @971  · 22:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @012  · 23:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.