Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irina Lunina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Irina Lunina

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. NY Times references are from oped piece written by the subject, and the PRI reference comes from that article also, all relating to her view on the Bear Stearns collapse (WP:Oneevent. Attollo reference is from her new employer. No reliable sources in GHits, GNews limited to above, no GBooks/GScholar hits. GregJackP (talk) 12:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Fails WP:N. Of the sources listed in the article, the New York Times article is reliable (editorial control), but not independent, being written by Ms Lunina herself.  The DealBook Blog may or may not be reliable but in any case the coverage is not significant, being essentially just a vox pop.  The one at PRI's The World is interesting - it's both reliable and significant but again it's just a really extended vox pop look at the collapse of her employer.  My good faith searches failed to turn up anything else that could be construed as a significant coverage in a reliable, independent source. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The analysis of DustFormsWords demonstrates that there is not significant coverage in reliable sources. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability --SuperHappyPerson (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.