Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irina Terehova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 21:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Irina Terehova

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not cited, biased, advertising Sillybillyjilly (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 10.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. I haven't looked into this in any depth, but there are 21 references in the article, so to propose it for deletion as "not cited" doesn't make sense. If this comes back to AfD with a more detailed rationale I'll re-examine it. Until then, keep. If there are issues with the tone of the article, that can be edited away. Mortee (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep articles such as this seem to give quite substantial coverage. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  16:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  16:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  16:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  16:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  16:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Doesn't seem biased to me. I see a few unsourced 2-liners that I wouldn't mind chopping out and maybe slim down the career section (too many division headings), but I don't see evidence of advertising, and not just on a scale of "Some Advertising to Promowank", I don't see it. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  16:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are 25 references in the article, so to propose it for deletion as "not cited" doesn't make sense. Websites like Huffington Post and Journal de Montreal both have features on Terehova as primary subject about her life and career. She is also a celebrity in Myanmar. AfD is not appropriate in my opinion. I also don't see any evidence of advertising apart from having her official website which is a normal thing on wiki pages. I have also slimed down the career section like proposed. User:Lethweimaster
 * Keep There doesn't seem to be any reason to delete it. Lonehexagon (talk) 19:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.