Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris Computers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Both unsigned opinions are by, but their arguments do not address the reasons for deletion.  Sandstein  10:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Iris Computers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Re-doing a malformed AfD nomination that was listed directly on the log page on 13 October 2015 (diff). I am presently neutral regarding the topic. The nomination was as follows. "The subject does not qualify for a standalone article on Wikipedia. 38.95.109.37 (talk) 06:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)" – North America1000 22:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I simply see no improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  07:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This company and its purchaser have a bunch of press coverage, but it's all shallow stuff. Not enough under the WP:CORP policy alas. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 02:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete The page is now suitably improved. All feedback generated by experienced Wikipedia contributors was taken into account and shortcomings of the page were removed. The page now has references, valid press coverage, no marketing aspect and is strictly informational. The page gives the readers, information about a public listed company in India, thus making it important for this information to be in the public domain.
 * Delete - the addition of the 3 new references (the only work done on the page since it was nominated), does not help it meet notability, since 2 of the sources are press releases.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete Since Iris is a public limited company, information about it is critical to be available in the public domain. Instead of deleting the page, can we work together to improve it so it meets all Wikipedia standards and guidelines?


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.