Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IrishCentral


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:38, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

IrishCentral

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We successfully speedy deleted this piece of industrial waste that had been dumped into Wikipedia and subsequently groomed by company minions. This media organization is not notable per WP:NCORP and we are not here to be anybody's free advertising. Delete and salt and let's all go do something wholesome. Jytdog (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * And getting worse with yet more promotional editing, adding unsourced industrial garbage to our beautiful project. Jytdog (talk) 22:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


 * IrishCentral.com has been covered in The New York Times, Fortune Magazine, Huffington Post and many other leading publications--information now available on their wikipedia page.Its' founder is an internationally known journalist and a key player in Bringing peace to Ireland
 * It broke two world exclusives,Gawker.com among others credited them with breaking the tragic story of the death of Natasha Richardson, wife of Liam Neeson and Fortune.Com credited them with the world exclusive about the secret meeting of major billionaires in New York led by Warren Buffet and Bill Gates to create a worldwide philanthropy.(see links on Wikipedia article. The publication has been outspoken on the issue of illegal immigration calling for DACA to be passed and new laws that are not anti-immigrant passed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thurles2 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have no reason to not believe what you posted above, but what you need to understand is that none of that is really relevant to whether this article is ultimately kept or deleted. What matters is whether it can be demonstrated that the company satisfies Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) or Wikipedia:Notability. It's the Wikipedia notability of the company itself which is going to be discussed in this AfD, and this notability really has nothing to do with who founded the company or who works (or once worked) for the company. Also, since you seem fairly new to Wikipedia editing, I suggest you take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions to better familiarize yourself with how these discussions tend to work. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. --Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - press commentary about this site is minimal and does not establish notability. Shritwod (talk) 08:38, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, Jytdog has it exactly right. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC).
 * Keep, it is the leading brand in the Irish Studio stable, which has a significant, notable collection of Irish magazines. Bogger (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Which does not speak to NCORP or any WP policy or guideline relevant to a deletion discussion. Jytdog (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.