Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish Ferries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - withdrawing in order to mark for cleanup, as upon review it is savable. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Irish Ferries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Written as if it was promotional, and notability is not established within the article (thereby failing WP:NCORP and WP:GNG). Kirbanzo (talk) 17:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Not unduly promotional. Notability well sourced. WP:TROUT for the nominator. Cabayi (talk) 17:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Mainly listed as the sources appear unreliable (besides the Irish Times). Add more news articles to address my concerns, and I can withdraw as I know deletion is not cleanup. Kirbanzo (talk) 17:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * So now the Irish Independent is unreliable too? Quoted on 2 stock markets isn't enough? Sorry, I'm not adding unneeded refs just to save your face - you can back-pedal all on your own. Cabayi (talk) 17:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transport-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - It passes notability easily, try reading the article. INEVERHEARDOFIT is not a valid argument for deletion. Spleodrach (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * My main concern was the wording being promotional and several sources being potentially unreliable (besides the Irish Times, mainly). Kirbanzo (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It does not read as overly promotional to me, but if you feel it does, then you should edit the article accordingly. Spleodrach (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.