Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish Whip Wrestling International Heavyweight Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Whether and where to redirect any of these articles can be handled by the normal editorial processes (talk page discussion). Stifle (talk) 09:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Irish Whip Wrestling International Heavyweight Championship

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Google gives a grand total of 6 hits for this. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Also nominating:
 * (technically, could be speedied G4, see Articles for deletion/Irish Whip Wrestling)
 * (technically, could be speedied G4, see Articles for deletion/Irish Whip Wrestling)

--  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.   —  TJ   Spyke   04:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The promotion has been discussed in several reliable news sources. For example,, , , , , , , ,, and . The championship articles could use some formatting, but that's not grounds for deletion. Please also note that the re-created article is not similar to the first, as the big problem with the original article was that it was written as an advertisement. The current version is not. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be an argument to drop Irish Whip Wrestling from this discussion (which I won't do just yet), but what about articles on the individual events? --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 12:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe that the championship belts of a notable promotion are inherently notable. It should also be noted that the championships are mentioned in several of these articles. GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The sources don't seem that notable to me. Even if they did, they only really help the promotion. The titles themselves are not notable to have their own articles. Not sure about the promotiom, but Delete or Redirect the titles.  TJ   Spyke   01:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The title changes are discussed in the sources, which would also support their notability. I am also unable to think of a precedent for the titles of a notable promotion not being considered notable. I'm also confused as to why the sources wouldn't be notable. The Carlow Nationalist is a major paper, and its family of papers seems quite notable, even if it isn't North American. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the Irish Whip Wrestling page, redirect the others. JJL (talk) 02:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to main article because this title is not notable in its own right to have its own article, does not meet WP:N.-- TRU    CO   19:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.