Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irit Rosenblum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to New Family Organization. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Irit Rosenblum

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Created by article subject. Possible self-promotion. Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * delete lacks notabilty--Shrike (talk) 04:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep either this or New Family Organization and redirect one to the other. Rosenblum/her organization appear to be notable based on their involvement in several notable cases (with Rosenblum as the lawyer) and so on, but there is no need for separate articles. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Although there are elements of this which do seem to be self-promotion of some form, I don't think it's a case for deletion. The references are sufficient to justify inclusion in Wikipedia.  But the self-promotion elements do need to change.Squareanimal (talk) 12:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to New Family Organization (which is needs a complete re-write but has references). Stuartyeates (talk) 07:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge Not yet notable enough for bio article. --Shuki (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to New Family Organization. Presented references insufficient, IMHO, to pass WP:BIO or WP:BASIC; a reasonable search finds nothing directly detailing, but other more determined searchers may find something which meets WP:IRS. I think a merge is the best option. BusterD (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.