Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Chef Natto Battle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 08:59Z 

Iron Chef Natto Battle

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is apparently the only article for an individual episode of Iron Chef. Since Iron Chef episodes will most likely never be the subject of multiple reliable non-trivial published works, they are unlikely to ever meet the primary notability criterion. No sources, no article. A Train take the 05:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The only episode I can imagine coming even close to qualifying would be the one featuring American chef Ron Siegel, and only because both of his hometown papers sent reporters to Japan to cover it. --Calton | Talk 07:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Neier 07:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wish I could say that such things are notable enough to deserve their own article, but I think the Iron Chef article is descriptive enough, covering the Notable Challengers, and in the process naming and briefly describing some significant episodes. LordAmeth 12:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the episode is the subject of multiple non-trivial references independent of the show, it should not have its own article. -MsHyde 22:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The only thing notable about this is the notariety of natto, but that isn't really enough.MightyAtom 03:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a protest vote. I feel sorry for poor Iron Chef which has more general notability than most anime series.  Yet we have droves-upon-droves of such unsourced articles about anime.  (i.e. List_of_Naruto_episodes)  If one of those is brought up for a deletion vote we'd have fans of the series raise a fuss and the article would invariable be kept.  This is a serious flaw of the AFD system.   --Kunzite 02:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.