Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Maiden's 15th Studio Album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by  Dloh  cierekim  per discussion below and creator's request. Dloh cierekim  20:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Iron Maiden's 15th Studio Album
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While their new album will be notable, 'at some time in the future' is hardly confirmation that it's immanent, or even coming at all. WP:Crystal Ged UK (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It'll probably be recreated when released, but right now it's in planning, no solid dates.  Hope to hear that they came out with it, looking forward to it - but for now it doesn't belong here. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:Crystal -Rushyo (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Article is completely relevant and has citations. While the album has no official release dates, some users may find this article helpful. MaidenfansUS (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, dude, but it still meets none of the standards. Check the newly created account, and my response. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 18:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Article meets Wikipedia Criteria as relevant and has valid sources. Metallives82 (talk) 20:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC) — Metallives82 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * ...it does? There's a mention in a news article, that's it.  I still see nothing verifiable or noteworthy, let alone reliable.  I only see predictions of an unclear future. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice of re-creation. Mostly CRYSTAL stuff. SYSS Mouse (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The only verifiable piece of information in the article about the subject is that the band intends to record the album. Everything else is speculation, OR, or crystal-balling. And the future existence of something doesn't warrant an article unless we can meaningfully talk about it. gnfnrf (talk) 21:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:CRYSTAL.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - still too WP:CRYSTAL at this time --T-rex 05:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Untitled future albums should be speedily removed.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't exist, so shouldn't have an article. What if the band all dies tomorrow? One line in the Iron Maiden article is sufficient.Yobmod (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the brief mention of what Bruce Dickinson said during the tour at the bottom of the main Iron Maiden article was all that's needed at the moment, I think. There's virtually no verifiable information about what this album will be like, when it's coming out, or indeed whether it's definitely coming out at all. Definite WP:CRYSTAL fail, despite the fact that I'm greatly looking forward to it! ~ mazca  talk 13:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I have reviewed the "Crystal Ball" policy and i agree the article should be deleted and I apologize for creating the article. Mike (talk) 19:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment User blanked, so I requested a speedy, and it's now been deleted. Ged UK (talk) 20:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.