Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Sky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. After improvements.  Sandstein  16:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Iron Sky

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability asserted. Apparently fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that filming has already begun. (Note that production images from the official site apparently are of a demo shoot, not the actual film.) Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge verifiable material into Samuli Torssonen. The content of the article, once you strip out the headers and infobox, is really quite short anyway. --Killing Vector (talk) 04:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nice work sourcing. --Killing Vector (talk) 09:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This one's a bit of a pickle, since while the project unquestionably exists (for one thing, it received a total of 55,000€ of state support in 2008), news about its status aren't very concrete. I'm going to say Keep on the basis that the grant authorities don't just hand over fifty big ones to vaporware projects, but I want the record to show that I am biased. --Agamemnon2 (talk) 12:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 13:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 *  Weak Strong keep as is now fairly very well sourced and kinda squeeks easily passses WP:GNG. I was only able to add English language sources to the film, but if the Finnish language samples provided by Agamamnon2 are an example, it is now getting enough (international) coverage to tickle meet WP:NFF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nicely done, btw, on finding those sources. I hadn't even seen that teaser trailer. --Agamemnon2 (talk) 12:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to help. Just added more souces. This thing is getting coverage even from ABC and Reuters.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.