Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isărescu I Cabinet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus was reached that the article should not be deleted. (non-admin closure)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Isărescu I Cabinet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources, very little content. Cleanup tags date back from 7 years ago but has changed little ever since. More beneficial on ro.wiki rather than here. Nordic  Dragon  07:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  07:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  07:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Cabinets are notable. The English Wikipedia needs content from all around the world. Not just English speaking countries. AusLondonder (talk) 07:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. If the current article is ugly, the solution is improving it, not deleting it. AfD is not cleanup. --Cavarrone 11:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as inherently notable, just badly made. Any Romanians here that could help us with improving this? ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 11:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Inherent notability. A cabinet or government entity such as this is an absolute keep. The fact that the article needs expansion and some improvement is completely irrelevant to the AFD process; it's about searching for sources and external resources to determine if the article should be kept or deleted. Article quality has nothing to do with this process.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow keep – See WP:IMPATIENT on cleanup tags. In any case the table is probably adequate for most people. — Nizolan  (talk) 14:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.