Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is Finally Here


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The author created numerous nverifiable/hoax articles. `'Míkka>t 18:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Is Finally Here

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Violation of WP:CRYSTAL.  Jon athan  01:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, crystal ball or not, it's a non-notable mixtape by a non-notable artist.  Corvus cornix  talk  01:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed the speedy tag, as it was an invalid A7. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It is not an invalid A7. Non-notable music by non-notable people is clearly a speedy deletion candidate.   Corvus cornix  talk  01:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Technically, it is invalid in that it is not referencing a real person, organization, or website with no claim of notability (i.e. vanity pages). I, personally, think this article falls under the intent of A7, but not under the letter.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 02:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is prime speedy fodder. i have used   to get rid of rakes of such articles.  tomasz.  14:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. No sources on a future product is pretty much crystal ballery.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wildthing61476 (talk) 01:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, with much speediness. Unsourced, no notion of notability, yadda yadda.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 02:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced crystal-balling. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete even setting aside the crystal-ball issue, mixtapes are always non-notable, especially by such an unknown artist. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unsourced and per WP:CRYSTAL. Macy's123 (review me) 03:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please also take into account The World Is Ending which falls into the same position.  tomasz.  14:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.