Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Is nuclear power good, bad or, nuetral?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:SNOW. Nick-D (talk) 00:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Is nuclear power good, bad or, nuetral?

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod so doing this the long way. I normally disapprove of deletion-tagging newly created articles, but in this case I think it's better to have the decision now, before someone puts time into work on this. Personal essay, with no possibility it can ever be more than a content fork of Nuclear power, and no purpose would be served in redirecting it. –  iride scent  20:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Personal essay with a typo in the title Czolgolz (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay and a fork, no possibility of being a reasonable article as stated above. Davewild (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Bad ... err ... I mean delete as impossible to be anything other than OR. I briefly toyed with suggesting a redirect to nuclear debate, but then noticed there's a spelling error in the article title anyway. JulesH (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - If by some chance this article survives AFD, please at least correct the spelling of the title. — Realist  2  20:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay. -Atmoz (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball Delete The title is awful, the content is an essay, not an encyclopedic article, does not have a chance in Hell of becoming a proper encyclopedic article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete. One glance at the article is all you need.  --Lockley (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As Lockley said, one glance is really all you need. Although a section on Ethics could probably be added to a nuclear power article Pstanton 21:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
 * Like this, you mean? –  iride scent  21:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:ESSAY--Truco 23:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.