Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Malitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Complex / Rational 19:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Isaac Malitz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Autobiography sourced only to a database entry. No publications found in MathSciNet or Google Scholar; no evidence of academic notability nor of notability for more than one thing. My prod saying all this was removed by User:Kvng with no justification for disputing it, and with a suggestion to instead merge to positive set theory. There was nothing to merge; everything in this article was already there. I removed it from the positive set theory article as well because it was unsourced and had no hope of being sourced. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I agree with proposal to delete. Gumshoe2 (talk) 17:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Ohio.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per David Eppstein -- one thesis is not sufficient for WP:PROF notability unless it is cited so much as to become a classic of the field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mscuthbert (talk • contribs) 01:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 06:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.