Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella Bozicevic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Isabella Bozicevic

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT or WP:NTENNIS. LibStar (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Tennis,  and Australia. LibStar (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets NTENNIS and also just about meets GNG thanks to sources such as (bypassing the paywall)  and . Iffy★Chat -- 10:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Bozicevic is just a bare pass of WP:NTENNIS, only because of a local wildcard for doubles. Like Notability_(sports)/FAQ says: "The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline". As for WP:GNG, 1st source posted here (very local though, Gold Coast media covering a player from Gold Coast? no way!) is decent, the 2nd paywalled one is a WP:PROMOtional article handled by her former management company My Manager which they even list at and the 3rd one is a very routine match report of a local tournament. My searches didn't bring much up, doesn't meet GNG. Seems like yet another of those rising tennis juniors that eventually went nowhere. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify - While she barely meets Tennis Project guidelines, it's in doubles which has been on the wane for decades. She needs to show a bit more success before making it as a full-fledged article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment I also support draftifying as a form of WP:ATD per above. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Draftify - I agree with the two discussions above. Bduke (talk) 07:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * agree with this MaskedSinger (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.