Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella Soprano (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Cathouse: The Series. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Isabella Soprano
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable WP:PORNBIO - minimal coverage in reliable sources. ukexpat (talk) 21:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * pro-porn editors might argue she meets the crossover criteria. I restored the article after closing a drv. Personally I would support a delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cathouse: The Series. The one-paragraph "article" discussing her really provides no nontrivial coverage, and she otherwise fails PORNBIO, but this seems to be the way we deal with reality TV figures whose inadequate coverage comes in the context of their series. As a BLP with no reliable sources for biographical content ("she also happens to be the nastiest piece of ass in the place" really, really doesn't make the grade), there's no salvageable content to merge. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to Cathouse: The Series. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz is correct about the lack of notability. Comes up short on PORNBIO's mainstream media test. Fails GNG without significant coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.