Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isahaya Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Disruptive AfD by a possible sock; subject clearly appears to be notable. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Isahaya Park

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

possible hoax, original research, no reliable sources, no sources, not verified, etc etc NewAtThis (talk) 11:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, this ain't april fool's folks!NewAtThis (talk) 11:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Not a hoax; there is information on the internet. Meganebashi - Isahaya Park is a sister article that mentions a bridge in this park. A blog here from 2005 mentions the park, the Azeleas, and has a picture of the bridge that the sister article talks about. A reliable source is here, the Nagasaki Prefectual Tourism Federation. (To navigate, search for "Isahaya" in the page, click "Enter" above it, and click the park on the interactive map.) The sister article should be merged into this one, as the name is mangled, and it doesn't need a separate article. I'm going to add that link to the article, and see if I can get a geocoord from the interactive map and google maps (GM might have it labeled, but zooming in on Nagasaki gives me Japanese text that I can't read). JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 12:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The park is notable, the sources exist. Nomination by a possible AfD troll. SWik78 (talk) 20:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep No apparent reason to delete this Fg2 (talk) 20:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.