Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isak Rajjak Shaikh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Isak Rajjak Shaikh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to not meet Notability (people) looks more like promotion/CV. Winged Blades Godric 08:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Winged Blades Godric 08:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Winged Blades Godric 08:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * delete does not appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG - full of puff, agree with Nom looks like promotion. KylieTastic (talk) 12:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No pass of either or WP:Prof . Xxanthippe (talk) 01:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. In a weird way, I did find myself eager to read this saga to the end, but I don't see anything that speaks to WP:GNG or WP:PROF. Maybe there's a Netflix documentary in the subject's future, but not a WP article. I noticed that there is some first-person language in the research section, suggesting some copy-paste, but I couldn't find the original in a Google search. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This chemist, philosopher, institution developer, philanthropist, human rights activist, health and safety manager, poet, writer and STEM ambassador doesn't show any signs of passing WP:PROF or WP:ANYBIO, and the article is one of the worst examples of academic self-promotion I've seen on Wikipedia. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * DO NOT DELETE. this is not academic self-promotion; more citations shall be added by me and others from different locations. check IP addresses please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.2.218 (talk) 00:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - even if the copious promotional content were removed, which would require cutting the article down to a stub, the person does not meet WP:NPROF, much less WP:GNG, and it looks like this was partly created to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS, what with all the claims of unfair treatment by various academic institutions around the world. It is evidently not the first time, either. The claim of having received a honorary doctorate does not refer to what we generally mean by "honoris causa" but to a PhD degree, which does not amount to a "notable award" as claimed in the article. (This is all made quite clear on the subject's own website, linked from the article.) --bonadea contributions talk 11:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment--The subject has already enough of dealings with Wikipedia!I request the deleting admin to salt the title. Winged Blades Godric 15:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing much to confirm notability as almost all the sources seem to be published by the subject of the article himself. Even if subject is notable per WP:BLOWITUP I would suggest starting over. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 04:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: A dreadful mess of promotion, incoherent WP:POV grumbling and special pleading which has no place in an encyclopaedia. Besides which, there is no evidence that the subject meets any biographical notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: A separate page entitled Dr._Isak_Rajjak_Shaikh was created by pasting over the redirect to the page that is the subject of this AfD. Can the present AfD be taken to also cover that branched version of the page? Alternatively a CSD G4 can follow, or another AfD (which would seem excessive).AllyD (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.