Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isares


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, with a small dose of WP:SNOW. bd2412 T 02:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Isares

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. The disambiguation mentions "Isares" is a synonym of the Macrobrochis moth. Nowhere in the article "Isares" appears, therefore it goes against WP:MOSDAB and WP:NOTDICT. It also mentions that "Isares [is] Thai male given name", Ram Buttri Road is not about the name, does not mention it is a name created after Rama Isares, and the article merely mentions "Pao Suriyakul, who was the daughter of Prince Rama Isares" (WP:COATRACK). If Rama Isares is notable, it needs an article. But right now, this page is not disambiguating something. © Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 00:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 00:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Macrobrochis does mention, with a source, Isares as a synonym, and there's also an album by the name, so we have two valid entries so far. I don't think the purported Thai name should be included, while the album article has a notability tag: if it does get deleted one day then Isares could be converted into a redirect to the moth article. – Uanfala (talk) 01:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The source says "Original publication details: Scientific Name of Taxon: ISARES"; "Current Valid Name:	MACROBROCHIS Herrich-Schäffer, 1855". Isares is not in use anymore, it does not says they are synonyms. © Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 01:13, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the apparently imprecise language: I don't edit taxon articles so that's not my area. I take your word that this isn't a synonym in some technical taxonomic sense of the word, but a former name is just as acceptable as one that's currently in use. – Uanfala (talk) 13:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep but seriously delete and redirect the unsourced EP. And, incidentally NOTDICT does not mean that moths cannot be mentioned on dab pages. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep assuming the EP gets sourced properly - a recognized taxonomic synonym and an album title make a proper disamb pair. If the EP article goes away, redirect to the moth. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.