Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaverdyan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - insufficient evidence of notability. The speedy tag was applied to a work in progress state of the article where an existing article about another artist was being used as a template. The creator of the article corrected this but did not add sufficient evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC)}}

Isaverdyan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:Artist and lacks reliable sources. The first source does not mention the subject whatsoever, and the second source is simply "The subject." Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 14:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I am actually somewhat confused here. The subject of the article is Isaverdyan, but then in the "Art" section it switches over to "Micallef." Are these the same people? Nowhere in the article does it explain this. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 14:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * It appears the article Antony Micallef was used to provide a structural framework for this article. The leftover Micallef material has now been deleted. AllyD (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article on a recent graduate with press coverage of his solo exhibition. These are no more than the normal coverage obtained by the typical working artist and my searches are finding just the usual social media, Saatchi Art storefront page, etc, none of which indicate notability. Fails WP:ARTIST, WP:BASIC. AllyD (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.