Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishee Pardeshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. consensus after the relisting seems clear.  DGG ( talk ) 03:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Ishee Pardeshi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am questioning the notability of this girl. Her notability stems from being a 7 year old Indian girl winning a children's division at a Korean TKD tournament. All of the references are from a short time span and deal with that one event (WP:ONEEVENT). Junior events are usually not considered notable (many articles on junior world championships have been deleted in the past) and this isn't anywhere near that level. Papaursa (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC) Papaursa (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Hard to claim notability for a 7 year old martial artist who hasn't even won a major championship (and can any junior championship be considered notable?). Astudent0 (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the previous comments. Winning a children's division at a martial arts tournament is not sufficient grounds for notability.  There is some coverage, but I think it all falls under WP:ONEEVENT. Mdtemp (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Based upon Wikipedia's guidelines for pre-high school athletes.  The subject fails to receive significant coverage that "excludes the majority of local coverage in both news sources and sports specific publications".  The 'references' in the article and in a Google search really only comes up with coverage in Indian media which is essentially local for this person.  --TreyGeek (talk) 03:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.