Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishtiaq Hussain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 08:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Ishtiaq Hussain

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Delete due to absence of secondary, independent, reliable sources about the subject under BASIC Q1445 (talk) 13:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 19:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * delete fails WP:BIO. The majority of sources are YouTube, no in-depth reliable coverage. LibStar (talk) 14:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)



Keep:The mainstream media coverage of the subject shows the notability clearly though not in detail. Anyhow the subject establishes and passes the notability as these sources; 1 2 3 4 5, should be read and accessed thoroughly.Justice007 (talk) 22:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Clarity, reference 4, is the book written by the subject but the "Foreword" is about him too, by an academic on page 3. Justice007 (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Sufficient enough to pass WP:GNG per Justice007.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 03:06, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete Most of the references in the article are written by the subject or are his youtube videos. He is mentioned in passing in several other articles. In my POV he is interesting but I'm afraid to say that is not yet reflected in the sources. Jason from nyc (talk) 15:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Notability clearly established as per Mar4d and Justice007. Subject is prominent in a growing area of international interest. Jzero1 ( talk ) 23.05, 05 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.