Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isidro A. Negrón Irizarry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Wary of WP:CSB, but isn't even a major city in Puerto Rico terms. Black Kite 18:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Isidro A. Negrón Irizarry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A Puerto Rican mayor, and nothing more. I'm pretty sure that one needs to be more than a humble mayor to be deemed notable enough for a Wikipedia article these days Montchav (talk) 19:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Mayors of most US cities have articles about them, and I don't see why Puerto Rican mayors should be treated differently. DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. San Germán has a population of only 37,000. I don't think we have articles on the mayors of most mainland towns of that size. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I generously extend the standard to mayors of cities 100,000 or above, but not all editors even share that limitation. Well below WP:BIO, and San German is not a major city even in Puerto Rico terms. The mayors seem to all be redlinked in Municipalities of Puerto Rico, which is an attractive nuisance. --Dhartung | Talk 06:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, mayor is a notable political post, and demographics for comparison cannot be measured by US standards, US is the third most populous country in the world. --Soman (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, if there was proof that he is a mayor such as an article when he as elected I would say to keep, but since the article states only that he is a mayor and offers no proof whatso ever then get rid of it.03:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete -no evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 11:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete the mayor of this community would need something other than his office to achieve encyclopedic importance. --Stormbay (talk) 02:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Mayors of cities are notable; the fact that the sources are in Spanish and that the individual concerned is from a non-Western country should not seduce us into systemic bias. Skomorokh  04:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of secondary sources via Google. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  16:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.