Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isis Taylor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Isis Taylor

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be nn porn star lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. The award and nominations are unsupported in the article and the award is not listed as one in the Category:Pornographic film awards. It does not appear the award or nominations are "well-known" per WP:PORNBIO.  ttonyb (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete All hype and wishful thinking about being "notable" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhhhhhtttere (talk • contribs) 22:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: Sockpuppet vote stricken. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Penthouse and Hustler should count as notable mainstream media. Not finding her awards in the awards category may say more about that category; if I look at the competition she beat, the award is probably worth taking a closer look at. 132.195.109.67 (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG, all coverage appears to be trivial/promotional. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability is not established through significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Additionally, the subject does not meet the topical notability guidelines for either porn stars or entertainers. Regards,  Cind. amuse  05:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.