Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam FAQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Proto /// type  10:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Islam FAQ
Original research and POV -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOT A7: "lists of Frequently Asked Questions. Wikipedia articles should not list FAQs. Instead, format the information provided as neutral prose within the appropriate article(s). You may want to consider contributing FAQ lists to Wikibooks." --DaveG12345 01:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. WP:NOT A4: "Wikipedia articles are not: Propaganda or advocacy of any kind" It may account as self-promotion too (multiple mentions of the author and external link..).  Gr Af  Fi  T Talk Contribs 01:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC) See below  Gr  Af  Fi  T Talk Contribs 14:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per both the above. ImpuMozhi 02:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per above, pretty blatant breach of WP:NOT. SM247 My Talk
 * Strong delete, fails WP:NOT in more ways than one. --Coredesat talk 04:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. I am not here promote the author by mentioning his name multiple time. I am simply clarifying the fact that the information is from a credible person. If there is any part of the answer you would like discuss openly then I am more than willing to do so. you will find that answers are in line with Islamic belief and with evidence of Quran & Hadith. Thus neutral in that sense. If you verify the source and evidence you would most certainly find that the views expressed are factual rather that POV.--Sadullah (Talk) 11:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You should notice that the article doesn't only fail the NPOV requisites but also numerous others like the "no original research" clause.  Gr Af  Fi  T Talk Contribs 12:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

--Sadullah (Talk) 17:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation 17:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Author:This is the author Please allow me 1 week to improve this article. Since the subject matter is complex and sensitive. although the work is not mine but I have the permission use it. I will try to make the information as neutral as possible. your help and suggestion is always welcome.
 * Delete per nom, but allow 5 or so days for improvement first. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 22:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Supported by this (point #1). EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 22:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The author After reading your views regarding this article I have changed many issues that was raised. I would like you review the article. Please bare in mind that the subject matter is sensitive.--Sadullah (Talk) 22:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps it would be more suitable to merge this into Islam- this page suggests that Wikipedia shouldn't be a list of FAQs, which is what the title Islam FAQ suggests it is- maybe a rename?. Any other ideas, anyone? EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 22:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I support this, smerge what can be merged into Islam  Gr Af  Fi  T Talk Contribs 14:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * this page will only deal with questions that needs to answered in the form of article to maintain NPOV. this not a islamic guide in a general sense. --Sadullah (Talk) 22:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NOT and WP:NOR. --Musicpvm 20:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT, WP:NOR, blah, blah... Sandstein 07:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.