Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam and the Jews: The Unfinished Battle (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 03:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Islam and the Jews: The Unfinished Battle
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable publication. there seems to be nothing in terms of reliable secondary sources covering the book from a quick google scan (virtually all are retail websites), and as such appears to fail WP:BK. article survived a previous AfD, but no rationale was offered as to why the book was notable.  ITAQALLAH  20:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions.    ITAQALLAH   20:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions.    ITAQALLAH   20:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.    ITAQALLAH   20:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Plain POV by a Christian 'Messianic Jewish' organization that tries to convert both Muslims and Jews to Christianity. The guy's history is probably a lie, considering his refusal to publicize his real last name. See the article on him. --Rabbeinu 21:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral Since he hasn't been murdered or put on a talk show, the author must not be that controversial, let alone notable. Maybe the info can be incorporated into the article about the organization described above.  Mandsford 21:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous Afd's-- sef rin gle Talk 21:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, there is nothing in the previous AfD establishing notability of this book.  ITAQALLAH   22:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, I'm not sure how to 'vote' on this... what exactly makes it different from Jerald F. Dirks or any of his books? Charisma House just seems like a Christian version of Amana. gren グレン 06:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nom. Previous "keeps" mainly argued it should be kept because the author is notable and not the book. → AA (talk • contribs) — 22:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable book. The author appears to be notable, but not the work in question. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 04:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per the last AfD. -- Karl Meier 06:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. We do not create article on each and every book.--- A. L. M. 08:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't appear to satisfy notability guidelines. The Behnam 18:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * weak delete origional research should be deleted from wikipedia.-- Sef rin gle Talk 07:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mark A. Gabriel or Weak Keep. Edward321 23:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.