Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam is Not for Me


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  An as  talk? 17:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Islam is Not for Me

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Anonymous song posted on the Internet. No sources cited in the article other than Youtube and 2 other sites that are hosting the song. Article states "it is not clear who wrote and published it". Fails to establish song's notability through reliable independent sources, see WP:V. NawlinWiki 11:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Evb-wiki 12:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Islam is not for me either, but Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Without a verifiable claim of notability, this topic is not for Wikipedia. --EMS | Talk 14:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I had a long discussion with original author about POV issues (see the talk page). He insisted on maintaining his stance. I tried explaining that while I generally agreed personally with his assertion that the song is Islamaphobic, that designation inherently carries a non-neutral point of view. Furthermore, the song itself doesn't seem to be notable or attracting all that much attention. Realkyhick 15:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any real evidence that this is notable, beyond it being available several different places. Brianyoumans 16:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V and WP:NOT. Jayjg (talk) 17:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails notability, lacks documentation -- Orange Mike 17:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator. SU Linguist 17:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose-There are article son songs on wikipedia.This does not violate WP:SOAP.There are articles with accusations of anti-semtism why no deletion for them? The article needs expansion not deletion.It's all over the internet thats why I wrote hte article.-Vmrgrsergr 19:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - a bald claim that "it's all over the Internet" does not constitute documentation, provision of references, or evidence of notability. -- Orange Mike 21:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * delete poorly written to make a point-- Sef rin gle Talk 05:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions.   — Sef rin gle Talk 05:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete: Non notable. deeptrivia (talk) 16:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.