Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Center and Mosque of Grand Rapids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -- Cirt (talk) 00:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Islamic Center and Mosque of Grand Rapids

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A promotional and essentially unsourced article about a seemingly non-notable subject. The entire article talks about how nice a place this mosque is, and its only source is the mosque's website; no evidence of notability is provided, and the entire content of the article is an advertisement. This was prodded and deleted, but undeleted after it was observed that the person who prodded it was evading a block. Nyttend (talk) 05:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - it certainly is a mess, but in a few clicks, I found lots of potentially good sources:, , , , , etc. Possibly userfy, or incubate, or rescue? Bearian (talk) 16:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: most (all?) of the above links are bare/tangential mention. No indication of any depth of coverage at all. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Agree with Bearian. Contacting the religious institution to get a comment about something from the guy running it, adds to its notability, they doing that in the first two links provided.  Nothing gained by deleting this.   D r e a m Focus  18:10, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.