Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic criminal jurisprudence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete per CSD A1 and A3. — Kyриx  02:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Islamic criminal jurisprudence

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The entire text of this article is a restatement of the title. There are also no sources. It also is not notable enough to merit separation from the article on Fiqh. Perspicacite 21:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as no-content page per WP:CSD. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A1 - so tagged. I confess that when I opened this I assumed it was newly created and was prepared to give the "don't nominate brand new articles" lecture, but for an article two years old to be in this state is unforgivable —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  23:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh, well I guess A1 works as well... Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.