Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamictube


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Islamictube

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 09:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - there are multiple significant sources (some given in article) that have a small amount (4 or 5 lines, usually) on Islamictube, with a high repetition of data between them. There are also a couple of books that give a couple of lines on it. It all seems to come together to form a number of strong mentions in reliable sources. Because a large number of weak notability sources is still weak, it remains delete (especially since it is functionally the same couple of duplicated paragraphs), but it only needs a bit more to be a weak keep. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - To me, the article's promotional tone fails NPOV. I don't find a clear way with existing sourcing to write an encyclopedic article with improved neutrality without primary sources. Smmurphy(Talk) 17:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.