Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamismophobia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Islamismophobia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:NEO. The sole user in a reliable source is Martin Amis, who is describing himself. Ironholds (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism. The only mentions of this word on the web all refer to Martin Amis and are usually in quotes - indicating that the word has not passed into the language but is a term used by one person. --MelanieN (talk) 20:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism. I note that there was at one time a "islamismophobia.com", but that domain registry appears to have lapsed in November 2007, ten months after Martin Amis used the word in The Independent. Cnilep (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  —Cnilep (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly WP:NEO applies here, this is just a word used by a famous novelist, not deserving of an article. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 23:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment any objections of speedy redirect to Islamophobia?  C T J F 8 3  chat 10:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's a good idea, the term is discussed as specifically not being the same thing as "Islamophobia," and obviously seems to have been coined to distinguish how Amis feels from the more general "I-don't-like-Muslims" sentiment of an Islamophobe. Deletion without a redirect makes a lot more sense, unless there is a list of neologisms somewhere we can redirect this to. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 18:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That's unsourced though, but if you don't think a redirect is good then I'll go for....


 * Delete per above, mostly NEO.  C T J F 8 3  chat 18:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete NEO.  Arjun  024  08:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear WP:NEO. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. The only other redirect target I could think of would be Martin Amis, if the term is closely associated with him enough to make it worthwhile. I'm not sure that's the case, though. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.