Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamists in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted per WP:CSD. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Islamists in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This should be pretty cut-and-dried. User:Klavisioni, the page creator, is a CheckUser-confirmed sockpuppet of User:ChronicalUsual, a blocked editor who has created upwards of 60 socks now to continue his POV-pushing crusade in Syria-related topics. The only other substantial edits to this page were also made by socks (though one IP, User:149.154.159.142, remains officially unconfirmed). I would speedy this the way I've done other articles CU socks have created, but that IP user keeps deleting the speedy template claiming no one can prove he's the blocked user in question (CU uses an open proxy server to dodge potential rangeblocks and attempt to confound CheckUser, as administrators have noted previously). Anyway, the page is absolute POV bogus, it's almost entirely the work of a user editing in violation of a block, and it should be deleted posthaste. -Kudzu1 (talk) 15:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

I disagree. Even tough most of the work seem to have been written by a banned user, it is still true and is sourced. Kudzu is member of a small group who is trying to edit out any mention of extremists islamists in the page related to the Syrian problem. The page is very relevant to the situation. If there is some problem with it fix it, but as a page it is fine and relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.154.159.142 (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for giving us ChronicalUsual's perspective, as usual. -Kudzu1 (talk) 15:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.