Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismail Shabanov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. As no one is actually contesting deletion. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star  Mississippi  01:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Ismail Shabanov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I came across this article a weeks or so ago following a complaint aw WT:BLP. As it stands this is a BLP with woefully inadequate sourcing. This article currently cites two sources, an interview with Zavtra, an extreme right newspaper, and a piece by the Strategic Culture Foundation which is predominantly about something else but repeats some interview quotes by Ismail Shabanov from another source. Both of these sources are way, way below the level of reliability we should be using in a BLP, and both of them do not count towards notability as they are simply interviews. I tried to do a WP:BEFORE search but was hampered by not speaking Russian - there is the possibility that I missed some coverage in reliable sources somewhere else. Over its existence this article has been BLP prodded once, normal prodded twice and tagged for A7 speedy deletion, so it's probably time this came to AfD. 192.76.8.71 (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Created discussion page on behalf of IP nominator WikiVirusC (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Russia. WikiVirusC (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak delete - I am not automatically against using interviews to source BLPs, but this one is quite weak in coverage. Bearian (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.