Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismet Sejfić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe )³&#xF0F6; 22:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Ismet Sejfić

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails NHOOPS, GNG. You'd think being a member of a national team would be enough for N, but not at current standards. I'm personally on the fence on deleting this (not a highly ranked national team), but we should try to follow standards for uniformity's sake. South Nashua (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I added more references about him from what seem to be the top newspapers/newssites in Bosnia. Since he had a very good season in Hungary there is very good chance that there are some articles about him there, and possibly also in Lithuania where he played in the top tier league. Although he probably fails NHOOPS, he should pass GNG. -- Dammit_steve (talk) 19:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve He played in at least two European top-tier professional leagues. This article must be simply improved. Asturkian (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.