Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isnooker: The worlds most accurate online snooker game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Isnooker: The worlds most accurate online snooker game
Massive WP:NPOV violation in the article title. This is a minor online game, probably popular among its users, but no evidence of meeting WP:WEB is presented. Contested prod. Delete. Mango juice talk 01:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC) This article is not spam, not intended as an advert. I have no vested interest in the game. It is a description of something that exists. Fair enough about the title being misleading as an advert, which i would be happy to change it.
 * Delete per nom. I've moved it to Isnooker to conform with NPOV, but it's still only an advert for an NN game. - Bootstoots 01:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the redirect as we can't stand for nonsense like this. --kingboyk 16:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom KnightLago 02:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:VSCA. Viridae Talk 02:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam -- Deville (Talk) 04:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 04:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete video game spam --Xrblsnggt 06:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. J I P  | Talk 09:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * (The previous comment by, whose only contributions are to the Isnooker article and this AfD discussion.)

tosser hey kinu, your opinion conforms to what comes out of my arse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westredd (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB or WP:SOFTWARE (take your pick, since it's an online game)... only 2000 players? Even includes the obligatory awesome players list. -- Kinu  t /c  13:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Insulting other users in an AfD discussion will generally not help you get your article kept. J I P  | Talk 15:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No, but neither should it harm the article's chances; the article should be judged on its merits, not on its author's conduct and/or compliance with WP:NPA. And this article, judged on the merits, is a clear Delete with extreme prejudice. VoiceOfReason 06:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. --Gray Porpoise 14:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete it appears to be advertising. Knowing Is Half The Battle 14:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam rootology (T) 15:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --kingboyk 16:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.