Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isobel Stellar and the Ubuntu Song


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 23:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Isobel Stellar and the Ubuntu Song

 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Walled garden of articles about a novel and various characters and fictional elements within it, with no properly sourced evidence of notability given (the articles' only "references" are to each other, and even the writer doesn't have an article.) Prod notice removed by creator with no compelling new evidence of notability provided. And even if such sources could be added to demonstrate sufficient notability, I'd still be unclear as to why we needed a separate article about each of these topics instead of a single one about the novel itself. Delete all if real references aren't forthcoming; merge subtopics to one article about the novel if they are. Bearcat (talk) 19:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all, WP:SPAM. - DonCalo (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete all, WP:SPAM.--Cox wasan (talk) 19:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all Google books does not find at all. Plain old Google search finds few results, none RS that I can tell. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete all as SPAM for a product with no coverage in reliable sources whatsoever. -- Whpq (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.