Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isokoboy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 02:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Isokoboy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:COMEDIAN. The creator of this page previously created an article about the subject under the name Clem Ogus. You can view the AFD entry at Articles for deletion/Clem Ogus. This article is filled with trivial promotional info. Moreover, the references cited are not independent of the subject.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 15:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep– Subject of the article meet WP:GNG. It has been the subject of multiple independent Reliable sources. See this Punch Newspaper, The Nation, NNU Nigeria and this Nigerian Newspaper to point out few. DDluv09DDluv09 05:23, 05 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's my analysis of the sources by DDluv:


 * I don't have time to do a full BEFORE so I'm not voting delete but will say that these sources do not combine to pass GNG. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

I made an improvement on the article after researching on the subject and was able to add more reference sources found online about the subject. Delords (talk)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Delords for the improvement made to the article. Are there any more reviews and recommendations for the page improvement where necessary and if there's none, I request that the delete notice be dropped and removed from the article. I appreciate all for their efforts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddluv09 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 16 May 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as unambiguous WP:PROMO constructed from unreliable sources and WP:GOSSIP. This is fundamentally unencyclopedic in tone and content, and it falls under multiple criteria for what Wikipedia is not, by policy. Bakazaka (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject doesn't meet GNG as it stands, borderline yellow page content at best. --qedk (t 桜 c) 22:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I really don't think it should be deleted, there are basic criteria of notability that the subject meets, there are reliable sources cited in the article with significant coverage of the subject. I will rather recommendations be made to further develop an article as this than for it to be deleted out-rightly.  Delords (talk) 03:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep The Article is gaining edits and it keep improving. I won’t say delete because there are reliable sources in the article such as Punch Newspapers, The Nation Newspapers and more. The article needs improvement but the notability is established. Thank you DDluv09DDluv09 03:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Multiple votes struck. --qedk (t 桜 c) 14:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. It appears that has a WP:COI with the subject of this article. Per Sockpuppet investigations/Ddluv09/Archive, DDluv09 created an article about View Nigeria, the website the subject founded. Keep in mind that they also created an article about the subject under the name Clems Ogus.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 22:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * CommentThere is no WP:COI with the Subject of the article, the articles you mentioned were created some years ago. Clem Ogus was created in 2014 while View Nigeria was created in 2015 and at a time I was still new and with little experience at contributing on Wikipedia. At that time, the subject already had a good social proof of notability which made me create the pages then and if you check my contributions history, I created several other pages which got approved as I was excited contributing to the platform. I decided to create a page on the subject again because there's been increased popularity and coverage about the subject with good social proofs.DDluv09DDluv09 05:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.